3 oppose awards of up to $1,000 each for Rose 4 Shakespeare, Connie Linne, and Ashley Malott King 5 those awards, however, will not be paid from the 6 $12,970,000 settlement fund. The Clubs will not oppose the payment of incentive 24 awards to class representatives of up to $15,000 for 25 Tracy Dawn Trauth and up to $6,250 each for Jennifer 26 Blair, Christeen Rivera, Victoria Omlor, Jasmine 27 Wright, Anicia Vintimilla, Marsha Ellington, Selena 28 4 1 Denise Pelaez, Nicole Garcia, Reah Navarro, and Tami 2 Sanchez.
#Spearmint rhino number pro#
¶¶ 5.6.1, 5.6.2) if there 12 is still any portion of the non-reversionary amount 13 remaining, ten percent of that amount will be 14 distributed on a pro rata basis to Dancers who 15 submitted claims against the settlement fund, and the 16 rest "shall be distributed over a five year period" 17 to the Los Angeles County Bar Association Foundation 18 – Domestic Violence Project, Foundation for an 19 Independent Tomorrow, Women at Work – Job Resource 20 Center, and the National Association of Working Women 21 (see id.
![spearmint rhino number spearmint rhino number](http://s3-media1.fl.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/PE_M0mXrPIOWpKNn2SY1nA/l.jpg)
¶ 5.7.1) 4 claimed, the remainder reverts to the Clubs – with 5 the exception of a non-reversionary amount of 6 $2,723,700.
![spearmint rhino number spearmint rhino number](https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5740428.ece/ALTERNATES/n615/MAIN-Chloe-Khan-with-Boyfriend-John-Grey.jpg)
§§ 201, et seq.) and various states' laws. 20 The Dancers charge that the Clubs classify Dancers 21 improperly as independent contractors, thereby depriving 22 them of benefits that employees are guaranteed under 23 federal law (i.e., the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 24 29 U.S.C. 10 11 Plaintiffs Tracy Dawn Trauth, Christeen Rivera, 12 Jennifer Blair, Victoria Omlor, Jasmine Wright, Anicia 13 Vintimilla, Marsha Ellington, Selena Denise Pelaez, 14 Nicole Garcia, Reah Navarro, Tami Sanchez, Rose 15 Shakespeare, Ashley Malott King, and Connie Linne, as 16 representatives of a nationwide class of "exotic dancers" 17 (collectively, "Dancers"), are moving to settle a three18 year old class action against Defendants, the operators 19 of a group of "adult entertainment" venues ("Clubs"). The Court therefore offers only 8 the barest recitation of the facts necessary to place the 9 current Motions in context. 5 305), in which it denied Plaintiffs' last attempt to 6 procure the Court's approval of the proposed settlement 7 of this class action.
![spearmint rhino number spearmint rhino number](https://s3-media3.fl.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/aEz9vnLciWU-IMEWqHHWjQ/o.jpg)
BACKGROUND The Court has discussed the factual and procedural 3 history of this matter at length, most recently in its 4 June 21, 2012, Minute Order ("June 21 Order") (Doc. For the reasons to 23 follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Final Approval 24 and GRANTS the Motion for Attorneys' Fees IN PART. 311) came before the 22 Court for hearing on August 30, 2012. 317) and for Attorneys' 21 Fees and Incentive Awards (Doc. 311) 18 19 Plaintiffs' Renewed Motions for Final Approval of 20 Class Action Settlement (Doc. 317) AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES (DOC. EDCV 09-01316-VAP (DTBx) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (DOC. ) 14 ) SPEARMINT RHINO ) 15 COMPANIES WORLDWIDE, ) INC., et al. 337 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ) 11 TRACY DAWN TRAUTH, et ) al., ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ) 13 ) v.
![spearmint rhino number spearmint rhino number](https://10619-2.s.cdn12.com/rests/original/102_322885786.jpg)
Spearmint Rhino Companies Worldwide Inc et al Doc.